Difference between revisions of "Effect of very low frequency on H/V"

From GeopsyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Here, it is displayed how the H/V can be influenced but a low frequency content in the signal. For that purpose, we merge two different signals: 300px *one a...)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*one displaying a low frequency component within [0.1-0.2 Hz]
 
*one displaying a low frequency component within [0.1-0.2 Hz]
  
Then the merged signal is computed in H/V
+
Following the Sesame recommandations, to define a 1 Hz frequency for H/V processing, a 10 seconds window should be enough. 
 +
 
 +
Then the merged signal is computed in a H/V and Spectrum way with 20, 60 and 100 second.
 +
 
 +
At first, the processing has been done without high pass filter. In this case, the 1 Hz peak appears only with the 100 seconds windowing.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:No_high_pass_filter.png|300px]]
 +
 
 +
Later on, another processing has been done with a 0.5 Hz high pass filter. In this case, the 1 Hz peak appears directly with a 20 seconds windowing.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:High_pass_filter.png|300px]]

Revision as of 17:33, 10 March 2010

Here, it is displayed how the H/V can be influenced but a low frequency content in the signal. For that purpose, we merge two different signals:

Merging signals.png

  • one at a site having a resonance frequency around 1 Hz
  • one displaying a low frequency component within [0.1-0.2 Hz]

Following the Sesame recommandations, to define a 1 Hz frequency for H/V processing, a 10 seconds window should be enough.

Then the merged signal is computed in a H/V and Spectrum way with 20, 60 and 100 second.

At first, the processing has been done without high pass filter. In this case, the 1 Hz peak appears only with the 100 seconds windowing.

No high pass filter.png

Later on, another processing has been done with a 0.5 Hz high pass filter. In this case, the 1 Hz peak appears directly with a 20 seconds windowing.

High pass filter.png